Tuesday, November 26, 2013

Why Do We Eat? A Neurobiological Perspective. Part III

During the chief pole, I explained to facilitate all voluntary trial are driven by a central court case selection usage in the mesolimbic area (the reward system).  This is the part of you to facilitate makes the decision to acquit yourself, or not to acquit yourself.  This usage determines your overall motivation to find food, based on a variety of inside and peripheral factors, representing illustration appetite, the effort requisite to find food, and the sensory qualities of food/drink.  These factors are much-admired and processed by a total of specialized 'modules' in the brain, and forwarded to the reward usage wherever the decision to dine, or not to dine, is made.  Researchers divide food intake into two categories: 1) drinking from a actual energy need by the body (homeostatic eating), e.G. Appetite, and 2) drinking representing other reasons (non-homeostatic eating), e.G. Drinking representing social reasons or since the food tastes really respectable.

During the support pole of the cycle, we explored how the brain regulates food intake on a meal-to meal basis based on reaction from the digestive usage, and how food properties can influence this process.  The integrated gut-brain usage to facilitate accomplishes this can be called the satiety usage.

During this pole, we'll explore the energy homeostasis usage, which regulates energy balance (energy in in opposition to. Energy out) and body fatness on a long word basis.

The Energy Homeostasis System

Read more »

No comments:

Post a Comment